melvin gullard, kevin randleman, sokodjou, lesnar, anthony johnson, etc. why does everyone think that being explosive makes you able to beat the champ? it seems like a technical fighter always wins versus an explosive fighter. also, IMO i believe being too explosive is both a sign of no mental control and being risky. id rather root for fedor than a guy who just swings for the fences. id rather root for machida, who can outskill his opponent, and use his explosiveness as a weakness against them.