ummm Atheists?

Discussion in 'IntroSpectrum' started by Radium, Apr 18, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. KingMenace

    KingMenace YOU MAD.

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2004
    Messages:
    6,001
    Please do poke away though. And I'll return the favor. "Judge, and be judged" is my motto.
    test
  2. Radium

    Radium f k

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,535
    respond to the points made in post 15 then. since you are a proud atheist you should happily see this as a way to thump your chest about atheism even more
    test
  3. StopDrop&LOL

    StopDrop&LOL Take the RED pill

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    643
    If you are talking to someone specific, it is helpful to indicate whom you are addressing, otherwise how would the "you" you are addressing know s/he is the "you"? If you are asking a general question, if "you" is aimed at atheists in general, it would be helpful not to ask the question as if it were aimed at an (unnamed and thus indeterminate) individual.

    In case it is a general "you" and you want responses from whomever, my answer is: no, not really. I have pretty high standards for what is pride-worthy, and I haven't accomplished anything out of the ordinary. I know a lot of people who are far more accomplished than I; in light of their accomplishments, I would feel kind of silly to be all proud of myself and my pedestrian accomplishments.
    test
  4. Radium

    Radium f k

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,535
    your verbosity betrays your stupidity
    test
  5. KingMenace

    KingMenace YOU MAD.

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2004
    Messages:
    6,001

    Intellectually limiting?

    Atheism is intellectually honest. You can speculate all you want on whatever "immaterial" bs you want, but you aren't basing it on anything real, anything tangible. I'm personally willing to consider anything, but until you can demonstrate that there's anything, at all, "immaterial" then disbelief is the default position.
    test
  6. Radium

    Radium f k

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,535
    can we not look out into reality and make speculations on the unknown things we can't perceive immediately through our senses?

    socrates looked out into the world and saw a vast ocean of invisible forms floating nakedly through the world

    spinoza looked out into the world and saw a living organism; where everything was just another body part in the body of god

    leibniz concluded that god has created reality in a perfect way and that everything that happens in reality is following perfectly through with god's desires

    socrates, spinoza, leibniz ...

    are their speculations to the natures of god or the immaterial also so-called "B-S" and therefore worthless in your view?

    these are some of the greatest and most powerful minds to ever exist are you suggesting that their conclusions and thoughts are purely worthless and "B-S" and should have never even been attempted?
    test
  7. reggie_jax

    reggie_jax rapper noyd

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Messages:
    2,437
    no, i don't think contemplating the immaterial in general is a waste of time. it depends on the individual and what their interests are. philosophy has just never really caught my interest. i see people make arguments that nothing really exists outside our minds and everything is relevant and i truly get nothing out of it.

    it might limit me intellectually but the thing is that we're all limited intellectually, nobody can study/know about everything. so you might as well focus on the things that interest you the most because once you die all of your accumulated knowledge becomes food for the maggots.
    test
  8. Radium

    Radium f k

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,535
    so you concede that, through your atheist (materialist/empiricist) stance, you are limiting yourself intellectually?
    test
  9. reggie_jax

    reggie_jax rapper noyd

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Messages:
    2,437
    well i concede that through not being at all well-versed in philosophy i'm limiting myself intellectually. i would consider it less intellectually limiting if say... i wasn't very well versed in astrology or ghost-hunting.

    however, i don't concede that my lack of interest in philosophy is an inherent trait of atheism. there's nothing about the lack of belief in god that suggests that everything of value is material.
    test
  10. Radium

    Radium f k

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,535
    no not philosophy, generally

    but specifically, metaphysics/rationalism

    these two realms are blocked off to atheists who only believe in things that have immediate "physical evidence" ie empiricism

    because there is no immediate physical evidence of god or soul or form atheists consider these things completely worthless to speculate on

    which is what you are doing

    and

    as I am showing

    what the rest of you proud atheists seem to also be doing in this thread
    test
  11. reggie_jax

    reggie_jax rapper noyd

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Messages:
    2,437
    in that way you'd be correct, any literal reference to a soul or ghosts is meaningless to us. i can't say that in that way i feel like i'm missing out on much. it's fun to speculate on ghosts and souls but at the end of the day, i have no inclination to believe they are any more real than vampires or politicians that transform into 4th dimensional reptilians behind closed doors.
    test
  12. Knowledge

    Knowledge Guest

    *Insert stupid drunken remark here* All posts modifed due to sobriety the following day
    test
  13. Radium

    Radium f k

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,535

    Then you are in the same breath arguing that metaphysical conclusions held by some of the greatest thinkers in human history are basically worthless too

    you must feel you are smarter than they are I guess
    test
  14. Radium

    Radium f k

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,535
    you realize that works based on metaphysics dont only just come from organized religion right?
    test
  15. reggie_jax

    reggie_jax rapper noyd

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Messages:
    2,437
    i never said that i was smarter... but just because great thinkers in the past have made references to the soul doesn't mean it actually exists. either it does or it doesn't, it's not a matter of who's smarter.

    maybe you'd like to give me some examples of these great thoughts that i am supposedly labeling 'worthless'? just to put this whole thing into context.
    test
  16. Knowledge

    Knowledge Guest

    *Insert stupid drunken remark here* All posts modifed due to sobriety the following day
    test
  17. Radium

    Radium f k

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,535
    Speculating on things like god and the soul are things that atheists will not even permit themselves to do. they just flatly put down such thoughts as dumb and by extension they put down the great thinkers who have speculated on such things through human history as also dumb

    which is completely hubris...

    sigh

    you ever read the phaedo? thats a good place to start i think.
    test
  18. Knowledge

    Knowledge Guest

    *Insert stupid drunken remark here* All posts modifed due to sobriety the following day
    test
  19. reggie_jax

    reggie_jax rapper noyd

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Messages:
    2,437
    nope, i've never read any real philosophical literature.

    and as for us not allowing ourselves to contemplate god, that's simply not true. i contemplate things that science can't explain all the time. me being atheist just means that i don't subscribe to a belief in god, it doesn't mean i refuse to contemplate the possibility.
    test
  20. Knowledge

    Knowledge Guest

    *Insert stupid drunken remark here* All posts modifed due to sobriety the following day
    test
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Users Viewing Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 0)