The Supreme Court endorses the personal right to own guns.

Discussion in 'IntroSpectrum' started by Turk., Jun 29, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Radium

    Radium f k

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,535
    Teq you know i had you hurt in the stomach dont lie for dex
    test
  2. Riz

    Riz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2002
    Messages:
    8,537
    Radium sonned the fuck out of Teq

    [wow]
    test
  3. Offbeat

    Offbeat New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2001
    Messages:
    43,056
    dawg we need guns just in case the government ever gets outta control

    it isnt about hunting or crime

    its about, if the government wants to do a takeover, they will suffer large casualties if not defeat by its armed citizens
    test
  4. reggie_jax

    reggie_jax rapper noyd

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Messages:
    2,437
    yea exactly

    not only should guns be allowed, more guns should be allowed

    we cant buy automatic assualt rifles, why the fuck not?

    how are we supposed to overthrow the government with a .45
    test
  5. barnizzle

    barnizzle HIP HOP

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2004
    Messages:
    7,636
    ahahaha damn nigga
    test
  6. barnizzle

    barnizzle HIP HOP

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2004
    Messages:
    7,636
    LMFAO
    test
  7. barnizzle

    barnizzle HIP HOP

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2004
    Messages:
    7,636


    ether
    test
  8. barnizzle

    barnizzle HIP HOP

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2004
    Messages:
    7,636
    nigga ahahahahhaa

    damn radium ripped the fuck outta teq! lol
















    how u feel?






    lol
    test
  9. barnizzle

    barnizzle HIP HOP

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2004
    Messages:
    7,636
    and props for that sig you got, X was goin' in
    test
  10. Tequila Jong-il

    Tequila Jong-il SALAD TOSSER

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    4,426
    I ripped this dude. Look how quickly his big talk descended into distress signals. Kid was upset.
    test
  11. KingMenace

    KingMenace YOU MAD.

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2004
    Messages:
    6,001
    Oh no.... gunz r evol... saive meee guberment. Pleaze take awaie all r gunz so u can bettir lorde ober us with ur iorn fiste.

    Actually the ruling endorses the right to own guns WITH PROVISIONS. In other words, you can own guns as long as they say you can own them. It's a lot like so-called human rights, which are different from inalienable rights. Few people realize that human rights are given to you by the state, which can also take them away. This is different from the inalienable, god-given rights described by the Constitution. So the 2nd Amendment has been hijacked no matter what way you look at it. You should be happy, Turk, we are one step closer to the one world socialist dictatorship you and your buddies so desire.

    Only a complete fool would want to turn their guns over to a government such as the one we have today. It just shows the extent in which so many Americans have been indoctrinated into thinking guns are evil. This can be blamed on the corporate media and public school system that accounts for the stupidty of so many Americans today. All statistics show that crime goes up with the passage of gun legislation. Don't tell that to the idiot liberals, though, because they know everything.
    test
  12. Radium

    Radium f k

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,535
    I really dont understand the argument that having guns prevents the government from taking over the country. For one thing the government is dependent on its people in order to uphold the economy. Its more damaging to the government for its people to simply refuse work than mobilizing an untrained small arms movement.

    But people who entertain that argument are usually angry bitter people. look at the way and style they present the argument.
    test
  13. barnizzle

    barnizzle HIP HOP

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2004
    Messages:
    7,636

    true talk
    test
  14. reggie_jax

    reggie_jax rapper noyd

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Messages:
    2,437
    lol... hm, wonder why african slaves never thought of that
    test
  15. Radium

    Radium f k

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,535
    this was a lose/lose situation because if they refused work they would only be killed and replaced. also there was intense levels of mind control to suppress them.

    when you consider society as a whole

    they can't just kill everyone and replace all of us. they need us more than we need them. a government without its people can't even exist.
    test
  16. menaz

    menaz Avant Garde

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2004
    Messages:
    16,807
    Best decision the court ever made, the founding fathers would agree, and given the 2.5 million self defenses per year which is one defensive gun use every 13 seconds. I have to complement the ruling.

    Now imagin you strip guns away from law abiding citizens, What you're left with is criminals who can buy guns on the black market so they can rob, rape, and kill their victims easier. Talk about an unequalizing situation.


    guns aren't evil, people are evil. It's impossible for a inanimate object to be evil.
    I guess while we're at it we should ban, stake knives, base ball bats, golf clubs, etc, etc...
    test
  17. reggie_jax

    reggie_jax rapper noyd

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Messages:
    2,437
    they cant but they can make us think they will and break our spirits... and a chain is only as strong as it's weakest link
    test
  18. Radium

    Radium f k

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,535
    how many people are killed by golf clubs
    test
  19. KingMenace

    KingMenace YOU MAD.

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2004
    Messages:
    6,001
    http://blacklistednews.com/?news_id=136


    Supreme Court: No Inalienable Right To Bear Arms
    Published on 27-06-2008

    Source: Rogue Government - Lee Rogers

    Today the U.S. Supreme Court released their ruling on the District of Columbia gun ban case. The court ruled that the Second Amendment did guarantee an individual’s right to bear arms, but also went on to say that the government still has the right to control and regulate firearms. The mainstream press is hailing this as a victory for gun owners and a defeat for anti-American gun control advocates. Unfortunately, this is incredibly misleading spin by the mainstream press as the ruling essentially says that the government still has the authority to implement regulations to control who has access to firearms and who doesn’t. The Second Amendment specifically states that the right to bear arms shall not be infringed, yet these egghead Supreme Court Justices have gone out of their way to try to redefine what it actually means. Either these Supreme Court Justices can’t read or they have been paid off by the criminals that run the federal government. Not only that, but it is incredibly frightening that the court only ruled 5-4 in favor of the Second Amendment with limitations. The dissenting Justices essentially said that the people don’t have the right to bear arms. It doesn’t get much more insane than this. This is totally unacceptable as the main purpose of the Second Amendment is to ensure that the people can stand up against a tyrannical government and defend their lives, liberty and property. This ruling is more proof that the establishment is continuing its agenda of disarming the American people so they can setup a global dictatorship of death.

    The following is taken from a Reuters report which summarizes what Justice Antonin Scalia said on behalf of the majority opinion.

    In the majority opinion, Justice Antonin Scalia said the Second Amendment protected an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Although an individual now has a constitutional right to own guns, that new right is not unlimited, wrote Scalia, a hunter.

    He said the ruling should not be taken to cast doubt on long-standing prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill or on laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in places like schools and government buildings or laws imposing conditions on gun sales.

    This is proof that Scalia and the other Justices in the majority opinion simply do not have an understanding of the Second Amendment or refuse to interpret it properly. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights were written so that the vast majority of people could understand them. They were not written so that only lawyers and judges could understand its contents. Let’s take a look at the full text of the Second Amendment.

    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.​


    The words “shall not be infringed” is what is key. The Second Amendment doesn’t say that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed except in certain cases. It doesn’t get anymore clear than this yet Scalia and the majority opinion Justices some how get the impression that the right to bear arms is not unlimited? How can someone make such a statement and be a Supreme Court Justice? This is proof that Scalia and the other Supreme Court Justices in the majority opinion are not competent to hold office and should be removed immediately. The founding fathers were saying that the right to bear arms is an inalienable right. Any regulation of firearms is unconstitutional and the government does not have the authority under the Constitution to dictate who is allowed to bear arms and who doesn’t.

    With that said, the Justices in the minority should also be removed from the bench because according to their interpretation they believe that the Second Amendment doesn’t protect the individual’s right to bear arms. This is of course total idiocy.

    It becomes even more ridiculous when a so called pro-gun lobby like the National Rifle Association claims that this ruling is a victory for gun owners. How is this ruling good for gun owners? The U.S. Supreme Court incorrectly interpreted the Second Amendment to mean that the right to bear arms can be infringed when the language of the Second Amendment indicates that this is totally false. Clearly, this shows how the NRA is a phony gun rights group. They hail this ruling as a victory when it simply isn’t.

    Either way it doesn’t matter. We know what the agenda is and it involves incrementally abolishing the Second Amendment so that the American people can eventually be enslaved to the New World Order. All of the propaganda and lies cannot change the fact that this ruling is contrary to what the Second Amendment says. These Supreme Court Justices should all be removed from the bench for this ruling. It proves that they either can’t read properly or they are corrupt establishment hacks that love being slaves to this coming global dictatorship of evil.
    test
  20. StopDrop&LOL

    StopDrop&LOL Take the RED pill

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    643
    Hell KM, even a small victory is a victory, no matter how much spin they put on it.

    The most important factor here is that you can still keep a gun at your house. It's a victory for personal freedom, no matter how you look at it.
    test
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Users Viewing Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 0)