I'm far from articulate because I'm not taking a serious approach to this argument, but I know I clearly neglected to use the word ''all'' when talking about destroying guns. I didn't answer you because you put words into my mouth, such is your entire series of retorts for the most part. You say you want a good argument, but you continue to try to pick me apart rather than my argument. Admittedly I've not devoted too much to reasoning my argument, but when I can't get past an unrelenting ignorance when it comes to seeing 'Americas' problem from an international stand point, tell me what'd be the point? As for the emotional remark, as ever it's lost on me when you're taking the same cheap shots. I choose forthright, you'd rather be patronising and elitist. Either way I'm finished with the topic.