Required Reading for anyone who clings to the Marxist lie of Mental Modularity

Discussion in 'IntroSpectrum' started by Ghet for Prez, Jan 2, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. http://www.amazon.com/Birth-Mind-Creates-Complexities-Thought/dp/0465044050

    Sociologists are hellbent to convert human behavior into something more presentable to their unrealistic utopian ideal of extremist equality. To give themselves merit in this well-documented crusade, they cling viciously and religiously to a concept known as environmental determinism and shun genetics at all costs, calling them wicked fascist things. (the only known exception is homosexuality which is magically considered genetic to these people while studies that point to shared behavioral traits within genetically similar kin is considered racist and immoral)

    This book destroys the antiquated mode of thought about Nature vs. Nurture.

    Read it. NAO
    test
  2. identity-X

    identity-X No Talent Assclown

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 1999
    Messages:
    14,025
    and if you agree with the above quote or are of the type who clings viciously and religiously to the idea that sociology, social constructonism, sociological understandings of gender/sexuality/etc and the like do not recognize the role of genetics, biology and psychology on human behavior then punch yourself in the face for not having a fucking clue.
    test
  3. menaz

    menaz Avant Garde

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2004
    Messages:
    16,807
    I still have not read this book but I will thanks for the reminder.
    test
  4. Identity-X, you have a long history of being paranoid of genetic technology, calling it FASCIST yourself.

    http://board.rapmusic.com/archive/index.php/t-1028163.html

    Google sees all, baby.
    test
  5. Identity-X, you have a long history of being paranoid of genetic technology, calling it FASCIST yourself.

    http://board.rapmusic.com/archive/index.php/t-1028163.html

    Google sees all, baby. Now go wiggle out of that.
    test
  6. identity-X

    identity-X No Talent Assclown

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 1999
    Messages:
    14,025
    what does my being wary about genetic technology have to do with anything? I can be wary and still recognize how genetics shapes behavior.

    [dunno]
    test
  7. Tequila Jong-il

    Tequila Jong-il SALAD TOSSER

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    4,426
    No you can't.
    test
  8. identity-X

    identity-X No Talent Assclown

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 1999
    Messages:
    14,025
    yes i can...and am.
    test
  9. You read Teq wrong.

    He didn't say No, you can't.

    He said No, you can't.

    Being wary of genetic technology and saying Sieg Heil upon it's application are not even remotely describing the same response.
    test
  10. identity-X

    identity-X No Talent Assclown

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 1999
    Messages:
    14,025
    still...

    yes I can...and am.
    test
  11. And still...

    Being wary of genetic technology and saying Sieg Heil upon it's application are not even remotely describing the same response.
    test
  12. identity-X

    identity-X No Talent Assclown

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 1999
    Messages:
    14,025
    i don't disagree. it still has nothing to do with my original response

    [dunno]
    test
  13. Deflect, deflect, deflect. That doesn't work in the real world.
    test
  14. identity-X

    identity-X No Talent Assclown

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 1999
    Messages:
    14,025
    says the guy who replied to my original quote without responding to it...
    test
  15. Riz

    Riz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2002
    Messages:
    8,537
    wtf, identity-X hasn't contradicted himself. In fact, his Sieg Heil comment shows that he does believe in the relevance of genes in relation to behaviour.

    And unless this book is saying that we still haven't got a clue how much of a role genes play in human behaviour, then it's wrong.
    test
  16. Tequila Jong-il

    Tequila Jong-il SALAD TOSSER

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    4,426
    just as you'd expect a FASCIST to respond.
    test
  17. The exact observation is:

    To give themselves merit in this well-documented crusade, they cling viciously and religiously to a concept known as environmental determinism and shun genetics at all costs, calling them wicked fascist things.

    Sieg Heil indeed. He still shuns genetics. He still makes his religious comparison to Hitler with everything he disagrees with.
    test
  18. Riz

    Riz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2002
    Messages:
    8,537
    If you're using environmental determinism and genetics as explenations for behaviour then he hasn't contradicted himself at all. If you're using them as belief sytems for controlling behaviour then you might have a point... but I'm pretty sure he's arguing against the former rather than the latter.
    test
  19. Tequila Jong-il

    Tequila Jong-il SALAD TOSSER

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    4,426
    why is is that people act as if man hasnt been breeding animals in view of fostering certain dispositions of temperament for centuries? there is a reason that certain breeds of dog must wear muzzles regardless of whether they were reared by joe public or a pet behavioral specialist.

    We know more than enough about the role of genetics in behaviour to conclude that sociology is bunk and that sociologists are all faggots.
    test
  20. Riz

    Riz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2002
    Messages:
    8,537
    You've just been conditioned by society to believe that.
    test
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Users Viewing Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 0)