Discussion in 'Smack Down!' started by M-theory, Dec 15, 2013.
Hope not, but it seems to naturally come about with the two belts suspended.
A title swap seems plausible.
and is utterly pointless
Which makes it seem more likely.
can't argue with that
After the pretty awful PPV buyrates they've had the last few months (especially with that title match non-finish a couple months ago), all the talk of there being "one winner" and their biggest time of year coming up, it's probably in their best interest not to totally fuck the people who are actually buying PPVs.
But if it happens, it happens. You aren't suggesting that the finish is staged are you?
That whole match seeeeeeeeemed....meh.
For a one match show, the one match definitely didn't deliver.
WWE no sold it's own gimmick PPV.
so were the two best matches on this ppv both three-on-one handicap matches? i think i liked both of them better than the tlc match.
All the matches with 4+ people were better than the TLC.
What is the point of having a TLC PPV if only one match is a TLC match?
I miss the old school TLC matches with the Hardy's, Dudleys, Edge&Christian
told my friend that yesterday. we were baffled that not one match was TLC when back at the beginning of this ppv every match would be a TLC or hardcore match.
at least cena didn't win. shit ppv though.
the quicker cena loses his belts the quicker he is to tying ric flair.
wasn't it just one tables match, one ladders match, one chairs match and then a tlc match? tbh the tables and chairs matches were usually shit.
i don't remember. i just remember lots of bleeding and hilarity. hardcore matches were terribly entertaining to me.
Separate names with a comma.