Discussion in 'Overtime: Off-Topic Discussion' started by Stock, Jan 28, 2011.
wtf just happened
Hahaha shiiiiitttttt Mookie.
Coles: It's a trippy mafucka with my girl actin' all sexy and shit.
wow, black swan is not that good. an impressive, but hollow and ridiculously overstylized genre construction. just like requiem... it's sole point is that self-destruction is self-destructive. that's it. it's packed with references to his other films (some form of self-mutilation also happens in both pi, requiem and the wrestler) and meta level stuff (technically flawless, but lacking substance/emotion is the exact problem of all aronofsky flicks besides the wrestler and (maybe) the fountain) which never gets interesting because his other film aren't that good either. watch dead ringers.
she looks good n sexy when shes tan but looks average when pale
is this more illuminati shit?
brb lemme go boil some illuminati hotdogs then add some input
Mookie, chill. I'm taking it as you posting all that to answer a question about what the movie is about but copy/pasting all of that is unnecessary.
Duly Noted however I think you missed the part that read "IN CONCLUSION."
Wtf just happened to my beautiful thread?
> : (
I noticed. My point remains the same though.
If it is from a large article, post a link or an excerpt with the synopsis. Posting that 4 post long review/examination of the film is excessive when that isn't what this thread is about. Even if it was, I think it's better to leave the thread to mainly discussion because there are other ways to share all that without making a bunch of huge posts.
It boarders on spamming. Like I said, I see why you posted it so it's okay, I'm just letting you know. It also can derail the thread to be just about Black Swan which isn't the point.
OH GOOD GAWD I Adore Her!
Separate names with a comma.