I find myself watchin more and more

Discussion in 'Emcee Hookups' started by Defcon_5, Aug 3, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Ace the Prophet

    Ace the Prophet A Prophet to the Game

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    4,343
    Yankees were knocked out by the Indians last year in the ALDS

    Bonds is a great player but because he's denying everything so much he's lookin like a fuckin douche bag, which is why he has no team. Same with Clemens. If they would've handled both situations like Pettite both would be no doubt candidates for the HOF. Steroids don't help with the most important part of everything in baseball, mechanics, but the players need to admit if they did when they got so much shit against them that it becomes pretty obvious.

    Rockies could end up coming back, but they're not playing anywhere near as good this year as they did at any point last year, so I honestly doubt it.

    Yankees will get old, but they're the Yankees. They'll attract young players because of the name. I'm a Boston fan as well, but the Yankees will stay good. And if the Rays keep things up there's good reason to believe the Yankees will finally have a season where they miss the playoffs
    test
  2. Mic-illaH

    Mic-illaH aka paisano

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2001
    Messages:
    425
    I agree that steroids is not the fundamental factor of what makes a good baseball player - but it does give the player an advantage over players that did not use. So when you combine good mechanics, raw talent, and steroids....its an unfair advantage....
    test
  3. Ace the Prophet

    Ace the Prophet A Prophet to the Game

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    4,343
    Oh, most definitely man. Bonds and Clemens already have some of the best mechanics ever seen in baseball. It's just they're assholes and if they would've handled things differently both would probably be playing somewhere right now instead of sitting at home watchin from the TV
    test
  4. Mic-illaH

    Mic-illaH aka paisano

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2001
    Messages:
    425
    Well, I personally dislike both of them. Clemens with the whole Piazza thing in 2001, and now all of the lying about HGH and everything (I mean, his own boy - pettite ratted him out lol).
    and Bonds for obvious reasons.....pretty sure nobody likes him, except TAC.
    test
  5. Defcon_5

    Defcon_5 Relax and take notes

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2002
    Messages:
    10,099
    Clemens>Bonds
    test
  6. Ace the Prophet

    Ace the Prophet A Prophet to the Game

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    4,343
    lmao @ only TAC likin him

    I liked Clemens more than Bonds but with all the denial he's lookin gay as shit. His career and everything with it just about went down the drain with all his denials
    test
  7. Defcon_5

    Defcon_5 Relax and take notes

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2002
    Messages:
    10,099
    clemens will make thehall of fame before bonds even gets on theballot watch
    test
  8. T.a.C

    T.a.C Guest

    ^ LMAO @ that. Bonds has records out the ass. most mvp's, home run record, single season home run record, first 500/500 guy.

    clemens has.. off the top of my head i cant think of anything. i know hes got well over 300 wins.

    bonds > clemens.

    if clemens is on the ballot and bonds isnt, as much as i hate to admit it, it would be a race thing. clemens is as big of a cheater as bonds is, and to be honest clemens is more of a scumbag.


    but its ok curt schilling is the biggest asshole in baseball.
    test
  9. Le'Negro'ttuce

    Le'Negro'ttuce Stayin Crispy

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,049
    They're both one in the same. Both would have been up for consideration for the greatest of all time in their respective positions but steroids tarnished their careers.

    Roger Clemens has 354 career wins, 2 triple crowns.

    Barry Bonds has 7 Mvps yes, the most Mvps, and Roger Clemens has the most Cy youngs with 7 including his own MVP, only pitcher since the early 1970s to have an MVP, would have been 2 pitchers if Pedro wasnt robbed though. Not to mention 6 World Series appearances with 2 rings. Hes also 3rd on the list of all time strike outs. Would have been second if he didnt fuck himself over and now Randy Johnson is second.

    I really have no argument to who is better. Both players careers were great.

    But none of that shit matters because they both are NOT going to get in the Hall of fame due to 2 determining factors:

    1) Steroids, thats a given.
    2) Pete Rose. Bud Selig stated when Pete Rose was banned that as long as he's commisioner of the MLB, Pete Rose will never be in the Hall of Fame. Pete Rose was banned for reasons other then playing the game, which he was great at and always played the game right and clean. They allow Bonds and Clemens in, they open the door wide open for arguments as to why Rose isnt in.
    test
  10. Mic-illaH

    Mic-illaH aka paisano

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2001
    Messages:
    425
    ^co-sign. Neither of them should be in....

    And speaking of Pete Rose.....is there any proof that he bet AGAINST his own team? I mean, if he only bet on his own team to win every night - i see no problem with that. But I guess his problem is that he has just lied about betting every single time - whether he bet on or against his team.
    test
  11. Defcon_5

    Defcon_5 Relax and take notes

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2002
    Messages:
    10,099
    nah clemens is better..how many rings does Bonds have that he ain't go out and buy himself
    test
  12. T.a.C

    T.a.C Guest

    ^ another stupid yankee fan
    test
  13. Defcon_5

    Defcon_5 Relax and take notes

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2002
    Messages:
    10,099
    ^ another blind san francisco fan
    test
  14. Le'Negro'ttuce

    Le'Negro'ttuce Stayin Crispy

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,049
    Pete Rose wrote a huge admission report stating that he gambled on his own team and many others.
    test
  15. Mic-illaH

    Mic-illaH aka paisano

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2001
    Messages:
    425
    I haven't read the admission report...but what i'm saying is...

    I have no problem if he bet on his team to win, i would only have a problem if he bet against his own team.
    test
  16. Le'Negro'ttuce

    Le'Negro'ttuce Stayin Crispy

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,049
    I really have no problem with it either. Banishment from the league is understandable but at least give him the hall of fame because of the way he played the game.
    test
  17. Le'Negro'ttuce

    Le'Negro'ttuce Stayin Crispy

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,049
    Actually that is pretty bad either way. No one should bet on their own team, especially since it asks the question on whether or not he managed the games to go along with who he bet on. Fixing always comes into question when you're the person that can influence the outcome.
    test
  18. Mic-illaH

    Mic-illaH aka paisano

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2001
    Messages:
    425
    As a manager, he SHOULD always try to be winning. So if he bet on his team to win - i personally don't have a problem with that. If he fixed games, to give them a better chance to lose.......then thats where I have a problem.
    test
  19. Final Chapta

    Final Chapta End of Story

    Joined:
    May 24, 2002
    Messages:
    13,735
    sons.

    mark grace is the dopest EVER.
    test
  20. T.a.C

    T.a.C Guest

    lmao its obvious you know nothing about baseball. clemens > bonds? dude, bonds could single handedly change a game. ive been to games where a team would rather walk in the tieing run in the 9th rather than face him.
    test
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Users Viewing Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 0)