Discussion in 'Audio Emcee Hook Ups' started by J o o k, Jul 8, 2013.
Not sure who is actually running this thing, but you would be wise to look at WHY the GRB was run the way it was run.
A lot of the ideas I see being kicked around here have been tried and tested and FAILED magnificently in years previously.
Like a 2 man finals? Who's brilliant idea was that? Probably somebody who doesnt know that you'd probably need 7 rounds starting with 128 battlers....at 10-14 days a round? Thats nearly 4 months to get down to 2 people...and if you dont start with a number that PRECISELY factors down to 2 then a 2 man finals is impossible anyway. What happens when there's 3 people left and you wanted to make it a 1v1 finals?
GRB's always had multiple people in the finals because unless you start with PRECISELY 32, 64, or 128 people a 2 man finals is impossible!
Probably headed for a shitty fuckin tournament if the guys in charge dont understand math...just my thoughts...
skrybe wuttup homie!!! you should join the tourney i could def see placing top 3
yeah a 2 man finals is kinda stupid , less entertaining imo
i liked hearing 5 heavyweights duke it out
The only way you could do this is to have the semi-finals (when you get down to 6 or 8 people) be like the old GRB finals where everyone battles, then take the top two people for the "new finals" or whatever.
And my guess is you'd probably have a hard time getting those two people to actually battle "live"
DZK, he hasn't read what's going on and I assume you haven't either lol.
That whole post is irrelevant.
That sounds about right.
sounded good though huh
lmaoo @ that long ass post tho
if ur in grb drop a link to your music preferably with a pic
It's pretty much the only format with the top two vote getters having the OPTION to get flown out somewhere, tbh. It won't be a 2 man finals.
Ain't seen you around RM.com for awhile. Thinking about signing up??
Separate names with a comma.