Extremist Liberalism... R.I.P. 1929-2004

Discussion in 'Audio Emcee Hook Ups' started by Ghet-Ghet, Nov 3, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Ghet-Ghet

    Ghet-Ghet Guest

    Written by: Ghetalion

    We now have a Republican senate, house, governors, and president. The alignment of the ideological stars spells an impending doom and is the signal of the never-ending apocalypse.

    Only if you are liberal.

    How did he do it? How did this C average student, cokehead, alcoholic, homophobic, racist, evil man completely obliterate the party that considers themselves progressive, intelligent, and (ack) right? How did he not only win the electoral vote… but the popular vote as well AND THEN go on to get the highest popular vote in history? How did this imperialistic, war-mongering, fear-driven, neo-conservative crush the holy righteousness of liberalism?

    They could blame Florida. Or Ohio. Or Nader. They can even blame the electoral vote system (and even the popular vote system.) They can blame Fox News, churches, and hundreds of other organizations. But never will their leftist finger-pointing be complete without accusing the entire population of America to be of a lower standard of intelligence then them.

    I’m wondering when they’re going to blame themselves.

    Liberal: Blame us? For what? For Iraq, Afghanistan, 1,000 dead, terrorist attacks, destruction of the environment… (blah blah blah)

    Did that approach of flashpoint glorification win you anything? Why are you still hell bent on doing it? Oh… I know why. Because that is how you were trained. That was the standard in the 60s on how to win points and perform civil miracles: scream about it until someone caves in. There was a lot of screaming this time around… but none of it worked.

    Liberal: Fine, then we’ll go militant!

    Slow down, Pocahontas. Islamic terrorists have had a head start on that approach for the past 30 years. Apparently, that isn’t working, and it has even strengthened the support of Mr. Bush.

    Liberals: Fine, then… we’ll protest!

    You protested before the Iraq War. The world protested with you. It didn’t stop it. You protested Bush for four years. He’s still the president. Protesting doesn’t work anymore.

    Liberals: Then what do we do!?

    You have now been placed in a position of extreme difficulty. No one wants to listen to you, and terrorist attacks just don’t work anymore. Thus, you have been officially assigned the hardest task any human can consider taking: ideological deconstruction.

    Bush represents all things that are evil according to liberal ideology. Yet, at the most crucial time, when combined with political mobilization, apparent global support, and the fundamental ideological motivation, it has completely failed you. Nobody can say you didn’t try. I’m not accusing you, the person, of being lazy. I’m accusing your ideology of being old and out-dated.

    Consider what makes your ideology of human rights what it is. Ideas like extremist individualism, extremist secularism, and extremist equality. Wouldn’t you say it’s… a bit extremist?

    Consider a concept of extremist individualism: abortion. It’s her body, she can do whatever she wants to it, right? Well, consider the outcome. What made liberalism so popular in the 60s was not the fact it was cool, hip, and right. It was the fact that the parents of the Baby Boomers suffered a catastrophic 200,000 dead in WW2. It was the fact that when the soldiers came home, they bred like rabbits and supplied more young people into the nation then existed older people. It was a convergence of variables: They simply had the demographic numbers to complain enough about anything to provide change. When we think about abortion, we do our very best to isolate it into a case of one mother and one child one time per person. This is does not consider the fact that one person can (and does) have multiple abortions throughout their reproductive lives. This also does not consider the nationwide impact this has on future generation population growth. In short, the liberal concept of individualism, when applied to abortion, is DECREASING the historic demographic of their voting base!

    Consider extremist secularism. Church and state must be separate. This may be what the Constitution says, and is a fundamental to the concept of our democracy. However, over the years, it has expanded its definition to include “Separation of Church and culture.” According to liberal ideology, not only must our leaders remain agnostic to get an objective view, but our view on society as a whole must also be agnostic in order to get an objective view. This approach is wholly incorrect as it considers a separation between religion and culture. In the process of taking this desire for objective research, liberals have intentionally bypassed and presumed religion to be nothing more then an opiate to the masses, largely to their detriment.

    Consider extremist equality. Communism was the last great hope against Western Imperialism… and it worked, had it not been for the efforts of America. After WW2, the great European empires fell into ruin and Communism moved in to take its place. However, Communism became an empire, and liberals all over the world justified it as being the great equalizer. The policy during the Cold War was to emulate some Communist/Socialist ideals in order to prevent a Communist uprising in the country. This approach had varying degrees of stagnated success… until Reagan came and changed the rules entirely. Now with Soviet Russia annihilated along with Western Imperialism… liberals had little left to run with. To this day, they still push to apply Cold War policies in a post-Cold War world. They still attach themselves to non-universal ideals founded because of the pressures of their time. By doing so, they’ve proven themselves to be out of touch with reality and completely unable to adapt for the future.

    * * *​

    I am pleased to be alive to watch (and be a part of) the ritual dissemination of post-modern liberalism. Ideas like extremist equality and state-funded morals were constructed to perform a specific task and now that the task is complete, it is time for change. It is time to embrace the new necessary polarization. It is no longer rich vs. poor… or empire vs. empire … or ideology vs. ideology. It is culture vs. culture on every single front: economic, technological, military. It is empires vs. empires.

    I stated one day after 9/11 that the deathblow of liberal ideology has been successfully dealt. Now it’s just a matter of how long can they lie to themselves until they have to abandon their localized ‘universals’ in order to remain a political force?
    test
  2. Ghet-Ghet

    Ghet-Ghet Guest

    I know this isn't about Encore, or Obama... but I promise, it will explain how Bush won.
    test
  3. DJ TRiPPiN

    DJ TRiPPiN New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2001
    Messages:
    2,930
    Im too slow lazy to read all of this how about just telling me if your pro or anti bush.
    test
  4. Ghet-Ghet

    Ghet-Ghet Guest

    That's STILL how you measure how to react...?!
    test
  5. Phantom

    Phantom T'is I, Ray Ocean

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2000
    Messages:
    13,677
    youre smart enough to realize that the eldery STILL get out and vote the most, are overwhelmingly conservative and ARE dying off.....

    there is a new breed of politician that will taking the reigns in another 15-20 years.

    i hope to be fortunate enough to be in that crowd, once i finish earning my commission and actually can afford to play the game, its definitely where ill be.
    test
  6. Ghet-Ghet

    Ghet-Ghet Guest

    You do realize the elderly ARE the Baby Boomers gone Yuppies and are the largest generation in the history of America.

    Sit and wait for the demograhpics to be in your favor, but the world will change much by then.

    Remember, you can't abort the elderly.
    test
  7. ANONIMUS

    ANONIMUS resident middlefinger

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2001
    Messages:
    3,989
    actually, good has and will come from abortion...see: stem cell research...which was overwhelmingly voted for rather than against...

    and in a free society where "freedom of religion" was and still is a basis in our system...a president should not show favoritism towards a certain group WHILE campaigning...He should have his faith...no one said he should be agnostic...but it should NOT be a defining characteristic of his campaign..

    and your third paragraph was just idiotic...saying anyone is better than anyone else because of class, race, or gender goes against every principle that makes this country great.

    none of those views are extremist views...if you ask me you are the extremist...

    you ask who we should blame? how about the people that go out there and vote blindly because of party...or because bush is a good ol boy from the south that likes nascar and crosses...how about people that get fed propaganda on obviously biased television networks...how about people that look at kerry as a traitor because he went to vietnam and came back to protest it, rather than seeing that the other canidate dodged a fucking NATIONAL GUARD weekend...how about people that dont know one issue about the election and vote because of "swagger"...those are the voters I blame...the blatant unintelligent dont give a fuck enough to actually create an educated decision voters...
    test
  8. Phantom

    Phantom T'is I, Ray Ocean

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2000
    Messages:
    13,677
    exactly, BUT im also too young to be eligible to be in much of the political world, and all i can do is as you say, sit and wait, because it is a waiting game.

    the conservatives played it and it worked, i give them credit for that.

    but the baby boomers are going bye bye. sooner than later.

    *overdramatic music*

    MY TIME WILL COME! lol...

    and to get completely off subject....i just want to confirm or defeat this....

    you are Ghetalion right? former Twisted Mentalz beat contributor?

    you might not have gotten the memo but this is/was Phantom from that famed duo

    *waves*
    test
  9. Ghet-Ghet

    Ghet-Ghet Guest

    Stem cell research will help, but not from aborted children. Only from cell reversal.

    There is no religious freedom in this coutnry. If you are religious, you are painted as a wack job.

    That isn't what I said, but thank you for thinking I said that.

    Read. It's really helpful.

    *yawn*

    But never will their leftist finger-pointing be complete without accusing the entire population of America to be of a lower standard of intelligence then them.
    test
  10. Ghet-Ghet

    Ghet-Ghet Guest

    It is I, Ghetalion.

    I've always known it was you, Phantom. You're time engaged in conflict has changed you, as it changes everyone.

    Again, you'll be waiting a long time until demographics are in the favor of Cold War ideology democrats.
    test
  11. Daniel Lawrence

    Daniel Lawrence New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2004
    Messages:
    394
    There is no religious freedom in this coutnry. If you are religious, you are painted as a wack job.

    There's no religous freedom in this country? lol C'mon now.
    test
  12. ANONIMUS

    ANONIMUS resident middlefinger

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2001
    Messages:
    3,989
    was it everyone in america that I blame? no...stop putting words in my mouth...if you took it as if to say that the entire population is less intelligent than me? well thanks for the compliment, but I dont agree...I saw first hand from people around me and people that tried to explain to me why they were voting for bush...and the exact statements that I had there were always the reasons...your arguments arent complete in the beginning if you dont try to cover every angle before someone replies...just because you type it again and put it in italics, has no effect on right or wrong...the eminem battle route doesnt work...

    what is stem cell research practiced on? I think you should know that...

    if you are religious you are painted as a wack job? excuse me, but bush won the entire south and midwest "bible belt" based on his faith...

    and your third paragraph was based on extremist equality, correct? so how was it not what you were leading to?
    test
  13. Fast Flow Productions

    Fast Flow Productions New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2001
    Messages:
    3,832
    ghet

    just cause we support abortion doesnt mean we think its ok just to abort any kid there is ......

    this whole state of religous bullshit, this spending money we dont have, this inflicting your own moral beliefs just doesnt work............

    bush is imposing his own christian beliefs on the united states...crap
    test
  14. Phantom

    Phantom T'is I, Ray Ocean

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2000
    Messages:
    13,677
    sweet, its entertaining to see what weve become.

    but anyway, im content to chip away and play the waiting game.

    no other option.
    test
  15. Ghet-Ghet

    Ghet-Ghet Guest

    Again, the argument is beyond you. It has evolved into seperation of religion and culture, which has proven to be fatal to the liberal movement.
    test
  16. Daniel Lawrence

    Daniel Lawrence New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2004
    Messages:
    394
    Explain this seperation of church and culture. In what way is it seperate, and what do the liberals have to do with that?
    test
  17. Ghet-Ghet

    Ghet-Ghet Guest

    So you are saying that the people that voted for Bush... couldn't explain why they did.. and thus... they are dumb.

    Again:

    But never will their leftist finger-pointing be complete without accusing the entire population of America to be of a lower standard of intelligence then them.

    ....? Are you done attacking the messanger yet or what?

    It's practices on stem cells. But will lbierals ever tell you that stem cells can be extracted from an adult pancreas or made from cell reversal sciences? Noooooooooooooooo... they're too busy trying to paint it as a plausible reason to abort.

    The only regions he didn't win was the extremist liberals of the West and the agnostic North East. Apparently, everywhere else in America (the other 30+ states) is SYMPATHETIC to his approach religion. What's your excuse?

    I stated the roots of extremist equality, how America emulated it, and how it serves absolutely no purpose anymore. Read it again, please.
    test
  18. Ghet-Ghet

    Ghet-Ghet Guest

    I have not seen a single conditional abortion law passed by a single liberal. Matter of fact, I've seen them PROMOTE partial-birth abortions.

    What's bullshit are liberals imposing their out-dated ideology on the united states.
    test
  19. Ghet-Ghet

    Ghet-Ghet Guest

    Replace church with religion. That's what liberals have done.

    The liberal society practices extremist toleration... as long as you are liberal. If your alligences go elsewhere other then to extremist human rights, then you are considered to be a member of a cult, a religious nut job, or a conservative lunatic.

    To a libera, it is the most polarized world ever: You're either Liberal or Hitler. There is no gray area. They don't know how to merge in the natural concept of culture outside of the definitions of human rights.
    test
  20. Daniel Lawrence

    Daniel Lawrence New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2004
    Messages:
    394
    Well, vice versa can be said for any extremist of any belief system.
    test
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Users Viewing Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 0)