Written by: Ghetalion We now have a Republican senate, house, governors, and president. The alignment of the ideological stars spells an impending doom and is the signal of the never-ending apocalypse. Only if you are liberal. How did he do it? How did this C average student, cokehead, alcoholic, homophobic, racist, evil man completely obliterate the party that considers themselves progressive, intelligent, and (ack) right? How did he not only win the electoral vote… but the popular vote as well AND THEN go on to get the highest popular vote in history? How did this imperialistic, war-mongering, fear-driven, neo-conservative crush the holy righteousness of liberalism? They could blame Florida. Or Ohio. Or Nader. They can even blame the electoral vote system (and even the popular vote system.) They can blame Fox News, churches, and hundreds of other organizations. But never will their leftist finger-pointing be complete without accusing the entire population of America to be of a lower standard of intelligence then them. I’m wondering when they’re going to blame themselves. Liberal: Blame us? For what? For Iraq, Afghanistan, 1,000 dead, terrorist attacks, destruction of the environment… (blah blah blah) Did that approach of flashpoint glorification win you anything? Why are you still hell bent on doing it? Oh… I know why. Because that is how you were trained. That was the standard in the 60s on how to win points and perform civil miracles: scream about it until someone caves in. There was a lot of screaming this time around… but none of it worked. Liberal: Fine, then we’ll go militant! Slow down, Pocahontas. Islamic terrorists have had a head start on that approach for the past 30 years. Apparently, that isn’t working, and it has even strengthened the support of Mr. Bush. Liberals: Fine, then… we’ll protest! You protested before the Iraq War. The world protested with you. It didn’t stop it. You protested Bush for four years. He’s still the president. Protesting doesn’t work anymore. Liberals: Then what do we do!? You have now been placed in a position of extreme difficulty. No one wants to listen to you, and terrorist attacks just don’t work anymore. Thus, you have been officially assigned the hardest task any human can consider taking: ideological deconstruction. Bush represents all things that are evil according to liberal ideology. Yet, at the most crucial time, when combined with political mobilization, apparent global support, and the fundamental ideological motivation, it has completely failed you. Nobody can say you didn’t try. I’m not accusing you, the person, of being lazy. I’m accusing your ideology of being old and out-dated. Consider what makes your ideology of human rights what it is. Ideas like extremist individualism, extremist secularism, and extremist equality. Wouldn’t you say it’s… a bit extremist? Consider a concept of extremist individualism: abortion. It’s her body, she can do whatever she wants to it, right? Well, consider the outcome. What made liberalism so popular in the 60s was not the fact it was cool, hip, and right. It was the fact that the parents of the Baby Boomers suffered a catastrophic 200,000 dead in WW2. It was the fact that when the soldiers came home, they bred like rabbits and supplied more young people into the nation then existed older people. It was a convergence of variables: They simply had the demographic numbers to complain enough about anything to provide change. When we think about abortion, we do our very best to isolate it into a case of one mother and one child one time per person. This is does not consider the fact that one person can (and does) have multiple abortions throughout their reproductive lives. This also does not consider the nationwide impact this has on future generation population growth. In short, the liberal concept of individualism, when applied to abortion, is DECREASING the historic demographic of their voting base! Consider extremist secularism. Church and state must be separate. This may be what the Constitution says, and is a fundamental to the concept of our democracy. However, over the years, it has expanded its definition to include “Separation of Church and culture.” According to liberal ideology, not only must our leaders remain agnostic to get an objective view, but our view on society as a whole must also be agnostic in order to get an objective view. This approach is wholly incorrect as it considers a separation between religion and culture. In the process of taking this desire for objective research, liberals have intentionally bypassed and presumed religion to be nothing more then an opiate to the masses, largely to their detriment. Consider extremist equality. Communism was the last great hope against Western Imperialism… and it worked, had it not been for the efforts of America. After WW2, the great European empires fell into ruin and Communism moved in to take its place. However, Communism became an empire, and liberals all over the world justified it as being the great equalizer. The policy during the Cold War was to emulate some Communist/Socialist ideals in order to prevent a Communist uprising in the country. This approach had varying degrees of stagnated success… until Reagan came and changed the rules entirely. Now with Soviet Russia annihilated along with Western Imperialism… liberals had little left to run with. To this day, they still push to apply Cold War policies in a post-Cold War world. They still attach themselves to non-universal ideals founded because of the pressures of their time. By doing so, they’ve proven themselves to be out of touch with reality and completely unable to adapt for the future. * * * I am pleased to be alive to watch (and be a part of) the ritual dissemination of post-modern liberalism. Ideas like extremist equality and state-funded morals were constructed to perform a specific task and now that the task is complete, it is time for change. It is time to embrace the new necessary polarization. It is no longer rich vs. poor… or empire vs. empire … or ideology vs. ideology. It is culture vs. culture on every single front: economic, technological, military. It is empires vs. empires. I stated one day after 9/11 that the deathblow of liberal ideology has been successfully dealt. Now it’s just a matter of how long can they lie to themselves until they have to abandon their localized ‘universals’ in order to remain a political force?