Where do you draw the line? This is mostly a question for the religious heads. God created bears… but somewhere along the line a bear had to adapt to its climate growing white fir and developing webbing in its claws for swimming. Now we have the polar bear. Who’s to say with the glaciers melting that another adaptation won’t take place over thousands of years that will change the species forever as we know it through natural selection? Would that not be evolution? At what point does a creationist say, “Okay… This animal used to be a polar bear, but has certainly evolved into an entirely new species all together?” The examples are endless. Please elaborate on this. It bugs the shit out of me.