Do you think games are worth $65?

Discussion in 'Game Zone' started by DefKnotEmo, Feb 10, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. DefKnotEmo

    DefKnotEmo G.R.G.

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2012
    Messages:
    6,381
    Do you believe games are often worth that price tag as far as enjoyment and overall product quality?
    test
  2. LungZzZ

    LungZzZ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2012
    Messages:
    3,219
    Some games I guess. Price is the main reason I stopped playing as much games
    (Rogers etc. all went out of business AWHILE ago, don't remember the last time I rented)
    but at one point in Canada games were reaching the 80$ point and it was CRAZY.
    test
  3. Sir Bustalot

    Sir Bustalot I am Jesus

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2002
    Messages:
    55,613
    hell no

    id download free if i could
    test
  4. GBREAL90

    GBREAL90 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2012
    Messages:
    41
    Whether they are worth it or not I can't say but I am not paying $65.
    test
  5. LBFHBMRBA

    LBFHBMRBA Fuck Yo Couch Nigga

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2012
    Messages:
    1,088
    I think they are worth it, but I'd much rather wait a few months and pick the game up for $30-$40. I have enough of my old games to play for a while to wait it out.
    test
  6. Sin-Razone

    Sin-Razone UnR3450n

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    474
    THIS.....yeah. I just copped a backwards compatible PS3 so ill buy shit ive wanted to try out for the longest time. gamestop has them for almost pennies now. Found this a couple of weeks ago for almost 50 cents.

    [​IMG]
    test
  7. Geedorah

    Geedorah King

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2011
    Messages:
    11,872
    No,its too much.
    test
  8. HANNAHMONTANA

    HANNAHMONTANA New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2012
    Messages:
    230
    maybe before, but for the majority, certainly not anymore. DmC is a 4-5 hour story playthrough and it's a full priced game. ni no kuni is 40 hours minimum and is the same price. mario 64 and final fantasy vii were both 40 hours and for the same price. what's the issue? the problem lies on three commandments of game retailing:

    1) there is an industry standard for pricing
    2) creating an AAA title only gets more expensive as time goes on
    3) DLC and other non-physical content is more profitable for publishers and developers than boxed games


    1: most publishers don't give a shit about the quality, length or well-being of a game or its IP. their interest is to move units and turn a profit (captain obvious) and the general consensus is that if people are excited for a new game release, they're just as likely to pay $60 for it as they would be to pay $50. if you pay close attention to games, pricing and their releases, the big honchos (activision, EA, capcom, other cocksucking money grabbers) ALWAYS release $60 games unless they're add-on content or expansions (a la street fighter & marvel vs cpacom expansions). only smaller-name companies that aren't interested in strong arming investors or their consumers break the mold. SEGA's latest racing game was on all platforms and was the most expensive at 39.99 (which, by the way, is the best and most fun karting game along with mario kart 7 released in the last 10 years). square enix released ffxiii-2 for 29.99. i hate the game and the brand, but you've got to respect the fact that they put out a full fledged sequel packed with gameplay for such a meager price.

    2: not much to say here. people want better graphics all the time for some reason and the more polygons and sharper textures there are, the longer it takes and the more money is sunk into development. by the time metal gear solid 6 drops on ps4 we'll be creeping into near-billion dollar investments on big titles. take into account things like forced multiplayer (everything EA), subscription prices for garbage like COD elite and the back-ends to make these things work, public online servers and so forth and game development is only going to get higher as a cost. this is also why games are constantly being made to be easier and less stressful/trying, as games that are easy to get through and enjoy are played more, move more units and are recommended to other people by those who enjoy the easy ride.

    3: another obvious, but when ebgames sells a game, they take a majority percentage of the sale. online stores take much less (steam takes 40%, for example), which is why DLC, add-on content and steam are such a huge cash cow.
    test
  9. LBFHBMRBA

    LBFHBMRBA Fuck Yo Couch Nigga

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2012
    Messages:
    1,088
    I've gone into Game Stop a few times and bought older sports games for like $5 a piece. I'm still playing PS2 games to this day. I'd play my N64 games if I had a decent controller (and could figure out how to hook it up to my TV. (All of the wires are a mess)

    I only have like 6-7 PS3 games vs. like 50 PS2 games. It's gonna be a long time before I even think about getting a PS4.
    test
  10. OurSin

    OurSin lol @ equality

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2002
    Messages:
    53,703
    Nope and the fact that used games won't be playable on the next gen consoles, they will either need to lower prices are be prepared to take a loss on sales as a whole
    test
  11. Caiden Clack

    Caiden Clack rapper/producer

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2013
    Messages:
    27
    no, and it sucks they basically force you to buy add-ons now to get the full experience.
    test
  12. PR STATUS GFU

    PR STATUS GFU Under The Influence

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 1999
    Messages:
    141,277
    they should bring them back down to 39.99!!
    test
  13. DaAlmightyDolla

    DaAlmightyDolla Greatness

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2005
    Messages:
    24,914
    nope.... and i refuse to buy dlc's.

    i dont give a fuck if im missing maps. ill manage
    test
  14. M-theory

    M-theory Saint Esprit

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2001
    Messages:
    38,468
    Considering I've spent fewer hours playing video games than the amount of dollars I put into the console, I can't give a fair answer. But even though it hasn't been worth it for me buying games around that price (which I have a few times) it wouldn't stop me from doing so again. Mostly I just dig through the bargain bin at Wal-Mart though.
    test
  15. Esoteriq

    Esoteriq Worst Behavior

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Messages:
    679
    Game industry pricing models are archaic and stupid. As Miley Cyrus pointed out, short games with no replay value and games with a ton of replay value get priced the same (for the most part). Games that companies feel they can *get away with* releasing full price, they do. But a vast majority of games aren't WORTH 60 you pay now.

    65 is horseshit. You're getting into "decent watch" territory at 65. I mean if we got robust experiences from all next gen titles that stretched 50+ hours of gameplay then sure.

    That's not what we're gonna get, though...so no. Hell no, even. If anything they should probably go back to 50, considering all the optimized engines that are releasing with the PS4 out the gate. It should actually be slightly easier/cheaper to dev for.
    test
  16. Esoteriq

    Esoteriq Worst Behavior

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Messages:
    679
    Luckily, this isn't true. Sony confirmed this as a false rumor, luckily.
    test
  17. Katastrofik

    Katastrofik THE SOUND OF L.I

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2001
    Messages:
    4,160
    Greatest hits!
    test
  18. Sterling Archer

    Sterling Archer Agent Under Cover

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2013
    Messages:
    48
    Old RPGs where you dropped 200 hours? Sure

    Campaign mode that can be done in 5 hours? Nah
    test
  19. Pyronoa Zoro

    Pyronoa Zoro Demon Cutter

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2010
    Messages:
    1,138
    For the most part, no.

    Sports games at full price every year with few minor tweaks here and there, definitely not.

    Campaign games with moderate to high replay value and great mp with free mp dlc like Mass Effect 3, yes.
    test
  20. Sir Bustalot

    Sir Bustalot I am Jesus

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2002
    Messages:
    55,613
    yeah there should be standards and reasons on the pricing.

    i agree with pyros assessment..

    i do notice though that all games may start at 65 bucks, but a lot of real shit games usually get dropped in price eventually... to like 30
    test
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Users Viewing Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 0)