Discussion in 'The Sanctuary' started by AliceHouse, Aug 26, 2013.
Whats the success rate of chemo?
It's not false, nor is it ridiculous. You and TBP don't accept evolution. The both of you also don't understand evolution.
You're also looking for any excuse out of the situation. You don't want to look stupid, but that's what is going on. And tacking on false claims about what people do or don't do does not help your case. People who accept evolution by and large are those who understand it.
So quit being an absolute coward and prove to us you have any say-so on the matter.
When you have demonstrated your "understanding" of evolution, then I can show you mine. That's the entire point of this thread. But just so we're clear... I have demonstrated my understanding of evolution in other threads. Do you know what happens? It gets nitpicked. And then I address those nitpicks. And then everyone shuts up because they know I'm right. This thread is designed to put the shoe on the other foot, so now I have a chance to nitpick.
Seriously, just explain how evolution works based on your understanding of it. Don't be a coward.
yeah wtf... just answer the question
since there is hundred of kinds of cancer that is kind of impossible to answer, but from all the research ive done, Chemo and radiation therapy has the highest "success rate" compared to any other treatment.
Whats the success rate on the most common cancer?
i dunno man im too lazy.
but i agree chemo is definately not that apealing
You don't know what I understand so how about you stop with your ignorance. Again How about you show your understanding of evolution first. You throw out a challenge that you yourself are not meeting Does that make you a coward
Really or would you investigate the accuracy of the 99 doctors. Maybe the 99 doctors are known to incorrectly diagnose cancers. Maybe the one who said you weren't is the only cancer specialist out of the 100 the other have other specialties. Just accepting the general consensus is not always right
so everyones just gonna ignore the original question
No everyone is waiting for the Original Poster to take up there own challenge
thats a cop out but do as you wish
its actually the exact defininition of a cop-out
cop-out also cop·out(kpout)
1. A failure to fulfill a commitment or responsibility or to face a difficulty squarely.
2. A person who fails to fulfill a commitment or responsibility.
3. An excuse for inaction or evasion.
How is that a cop out so the original poster can ignore the question and everyone else must answer no the OP refusing to answer there own question is a Cop out.
It's not a cop out it's just a logical thing I'm not required to answer the question and I've given my own statement of the OP needs to show there own understanding before demanding others show theres/
you know its a cop out, and youre just being stubborn. Alice didnt make a thread saying "I will before you do" Alice asked you to do it. Completely avoiding the question like you have is a cop out
cmon man anyone can see its a cop out. Dont be silly
ill even remake the thread stating that i dont have an understanding of it and want to know yours so i can better understand....
you would still avoid it. So why dont you just answer the question?
or do you want me to make it so you can? i will but sadly it will just be avoided
exactly you wont or cant.
one of the major points of this thread was to prove that you most likely only know how to nitpick through other peoples understanding, yet cant for the life of you explain your own.
which has been proven so far, so alice wins flawlessly. Everything Alice suspected, you prove by not answering and avoiding
nice job Alice.
haha Alice wins.
I don’t want to answer because I feel that its stated as a trap and it’s a cop out to ask what other people know without showing your own knowledge. And the fact that you only see the refusal to answer from one side shows you are not really looking at the situation.
Evolution is a big idea that’s hard to show your understanding of it. Are we talking microevolution within species Macro evolution outside of species evolution of man and mans origins within evolution.
The basic ideal of evolution Is the process on how species change over time.
Alice doesn't win as alice refused to follow her own request Just because I disagree how she stated her request doesn't make her win it's u agree with her position so you will close your eyes to any alternative
I've shown basic understanding and will get deeper as soon as Alice comes out of her hole
how about i make the thread? you know ive already stated i dont understand it, so there would be no expectation of me explaining my understanding...
so how about it? or no? are you gonna avoid the question again?
Separate names with a comma.