This right here just proves to me you didn't comprehend anything I said. Did you even read what I typed? NO! Let me refreash your memory since your a complete dolt. "She was in charge of the pakistan government twice and both times it was found to be "supposedly corrupt". However, she could of been set-up by ghulam Khan the first time in 1990. And could of also been set up the second time by Farooq Leghari and the Punjabi elites in 1996 for political reasons Bhutto was a GOOD IDEALIST but she had A HARD TIME FOLLOWING THROUGH. Her failed policies for women were mainly due to religious male parties incontrol of the legislature." Why the fuck are you arguing things I already pointed out like I didn't point them out? I don't understand why you are writing anything to this pargraph. Bhutto was granted amnesty by Musharraf which is why the charges against her and her husband were recently dropped. She did have a HARD TIME FOLLOWING THROUGH on her policies because of the religious male parties incontrol of the legislature as I already stated. Jesus christ, your comprehension level is thrid grade. arguing just argue hey, Utterly pointless. "she was a woman bold enough to finally acknowledge that the taliban were assholes, thus turning her back on all radical fundamentalism for a better way of life in pakistan." Correct, she use to back the taliban but then turned her back on them and radical fundamentalism entirely. Did I not mention this already? yes I did. WHAT NONSENSE AM I SPEAKING? I don't even know WTF you're going on about. Speaking of nonsense, this sentence takes the cake. I have no idea WTF you're even trying to imply here with that sentence. However, Here is list of suspected organizations and people who wanted her assassinated... Jundallah. Wahabi Saudis. Hamza Bin Laden. lingering supporters of Pakistan’s assassinated military dictator Zia-ul-Haq. Mustafa Abu al-Yazid. ISI. pakistan renegade military officers. Baitullah Mehsud. The Lashkar-e-Jhangvi Musharraf ( though I've ruled him out) Osama bin laden. Hamza Bin Laden. Ayman al-Zawahiri. Al-qeada. List can on and on... No he wasn't, you're just being politically correct, lying to yourself about the vast assassinations over there. Your view is very naive. It's not a fairytale, that's really the origins of Hassassins and their ritual. Lets think for a momment. Iran is between Iraq and Pakistan. Iran and Pakistan are both Islamic countries still harboring vast amounts of Islamic assassins which makes my connection still valid. perhaps I misspoke by not including the region of southern Asia to make it more clear, But we are hardly WRONG because like the middle east assassnations over in other islamic regions infact happen frequently. Thus, why noone is SHOCKED this happended. furthermore... "Pakistanis a country in South Asia, marking the region where South Asia converges with Central Asia and the Middle East. "Pakistan" means "Land of (the) Pure" in Urdu, and Persian."Waves of conquerors and migrants including Harappan, Indo-Aryan, Persian, Grecian, Saka, Parthian, Kushan, White Hun, Afghan, Arab, Turkics, and Mughal settled in the region throughout the centuries, influencing the locals and being absorbed among them." "Pakistan' is both a Persian and an Urdu word. It is composed of letters taken from the names of all our Indian Sub-continent homelands; that is, Panjab, Afghanistan (Pashtunistan), Kashmir, Iran, Sindh (including Kach and Kathiawar), Tukharistan, Afghanistan, and Balochistan." converge: to move together toward a central point. Pakistan is even a persian word, infact the region is basically a melting pot. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistan READ YOUR OWN INFO instead of just posting thoughtlessly about geography. That wasn't the point though, the point was assassinations are pretty much a way of life over there happening on a regular basis which is why Him nor I or anyone else is SHOCKED by this. Espeically since they've tried before and even wrote a letter to bhutto telling her they were going to assassinate her. You're view was and still is VERY VERY NAVIE. You have no depth to your logic either when it comes to thinking about cultures and geography connections, or the historical knowledge on the geography Hassassins occupied, nor how frequent assassinations are tried and/or carried out in these Islamic regions. As I stated before: In 1090 Al-hassan and his group of Hassassins capatured the castle of Alamut and from here on out he was known by all Crusaders as "the old man of the mountains" who spread fear throughout the Mohammedan world. The word Pakistan wasn't coming out of mouths until the year 1933. The country of pakistan wasn't offically formed until 1947. You're missing the big picture, Al-hassan and his Hassassin's ruled over parts of that Pakistani region long before it was even called Pakistan. And he wasn't the ONLY Lord of the fatimid empire to rule it either, Basically their rule back then streched into what is today considered Pakistan. Then along came the Mongols who launched a offensive against the Hassassins in southeast asia. specifically a mongol named Hulagu Khan who scared the Islamic persian Hassassins so badly that in 1256 they finally just handed over their death castle. We are all very well aware assassinations happen everywhere, we're just not navie like you when it comes to islamic regions. So we aren't shocked about this happening in a islamic region because it's been happening frequently for centuries and still continues frequently to this day over there. LMAO@hopeful. Hopeful of what? That she could escape yet another assassination attempt? This isn't the frist time they tried to assassinate her it's just the only time they've actually succeeded at assassinating her. The frist try was in 1993 by Ramzi Yousef and KSM. The second try was in 1995 by Zahirul Islam Abbasi. The thrid try was in oct. 2007 by Ayman al-Zawahiri/Al-qeada. The fourth try was carried out in dec. 2007 by UNKOWN? Obviously.