Discussion in 'Game Zone' started by .:Pain:., Dec 6, 2009.
^ Faggot fallout 3 was based on you, especially the super mutant part cock sucker.
no wayyy 2nd one was much better
climbing all high up in the tombs, while being high, i was like gasping and shit as i jumped from one spot to another haha
shit was wayyyy too easy tho
^ AC1 had a better storyline, protagonist wasn't a faggy Italian guy named Ezio. Fuck kinda name is that?! Ezio was taught by a whore how to be an assassin, fucking outrageous.
That's true but AC1 had some really monotonous shit going on at some times. The in-between chores were just annoying after the first two times.
^ At least AC had no queer white screen bugs at the beginning of every mission you get.
Exactly...Entirely too much of that shit in between the actual game. It just felt like half the game was filler. There was soo much more stuff to do in 2 I don't see how anyone could say that 2 wasn't better overall...
^ you got tricked, ubi soft gave you a bunch of useless unproductive dull shit to do to keep your mind distracted from the shitty story line the fucked up game physics and queer hip moves ezio did when he walked.
this game was better than the first by leaps and bounds and gripes about movement and shit just can't be justified. The story may be hard for some to understand cause the team decided to go with emphasizing many conspiracies and using a lot of bullshit but this game was perfect for the 2nd act of the game, and if you understand the story it is in fact dope as hell.
Separate names with a comma.