animal rights dickheads: explain what their 'rights' should be

Discussion in 'IntroSpectrum' started by teq the decider, Dec 5, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. teq the decider

    teq the decider sexual predator

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2006
    Messages:
    669
    test
  2. KingMenace

    KingMenace YOU MAD.

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2004
    Messages:
    6,001
    What rights does the average "man" have now?

    I for one extend all considerations to all other living beings. To deny the rights of some is to open the door to discriminate against many.
    test
  3. identity-X

    identity-X No Talent Assclown

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 1999
    Messages:
    14,025
    it's impossible to to lump the motives of all animal rights dickheads together.

    my personal philosophy? it isn't my place to take the life of an animal. it isn't necessary for me to take the life of an animal. I do what I can to minimize my contribution to taking the lives of animals.
    test
  4. MC Bill Buckner

    MC Bill Buckner New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2001
    Messages:
    4,990
    animals have no rights because they are animals. humans are not herbavors by nature only by choice. it is against nature to restrict your diet to only those things you believe wont feel pain by your process of consumption. it is impossible to treat a cow humanely because they are a cow. and finally i cant stand vegans.
    test
  5. Haze

    Haze I hear the streets

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 1999
    Messages:
    4,783
    hahaha @ animal rights
    test
  6. towelie420

    towelie420 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2006
    Messages:
    62
    i'll eat any reasonable animal meat when it comes to human consumption. but i'm against unnecessary cruelty to animals. them fuckers should be fed to animals
    test
  7. menaz

    menaz Avant Garde

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2004
    Messages:
    16,807
    ^ You know what, Im willing to bet an English-gangster would feed an animal abuser to PIGS. LoL!


    Now for the serious question. What makes you any better than a person who mistreats animals? You've substituted animals for humans. You rationalize animal abuse by feeding ("killing") humans who abused them. You advocate deadly vengeance against human animal abusers. You're just creating more violance, only your ideals are so radical you rather see humans snuffed than an animal mistreated. Both are bad, But not equally as bad. What you stated is much worse. And the people around you should be concerned. You have infact lowered yourself way beyond the Animal abusers level.

    Honestly, your Just spewing pent up peta rage. It's WHATEVER!
    test
  8. Prominance

    Prominance I'm Blacker, Trust Me

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2001
    Messages:
    1,159
    There are hundreds of thousands of people in the world dying every year from wars, famine and ethnic cleansing. Yet noone marches for them as much as people march and protest agauinst people wearing fur and companies that slaughter animals for food and so on. These animal rights people actually find the death and cruelty of animals higher of a priority than the thousands dying each year around the globe. THAT is what fucks me up about those people
    test
  9. identity-X

    identity-X No Talent Assclown

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 1999
    Messages:
    14,025
    um...

    actually, a lot of vegetarians (not necessarily animal rights folks) support not eating meat because of how it contributes to a "scarcity" of food worldwide.

    http://www.theanimalspirit.com/worldhunger.html
    http://www.innvista.com/HEALTH/nutrition/diet/vworld.htm
    http://www.vssj.com/world-hunger.html
    http://www.primusweb.com/fitnesspartner/library/nutrition/vegetarian.htm#world hunger
    http://www.goveg.com/worldHunger.asp
    http://vegetarianaction.org.au/Perspectives/PPHunger.htm
    test
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Users Viewing Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 0)