Discussion in 'Smack Down!' started by N A S T Y, Jun 14, 2010.
that don't mean shit if they aint posting
and that has to do with what happened on raw
there was 116 people viewing yesterday
it's because of the pictures in the tourney
don't be so bitter
those guests count as traffic which pay bills
now fuck off you thick twat
i doubt anyone cares about some old broads
probably some lerkers or one of the people who was about to post a wrestling is fake thread...
I would take the time to explain to you why it's the tourney but I am aware of your acute mental capabilities
^ look at the views for the threads, the most views to come from that amount was the daniel bryan released thread... there wasn't even 20 views in those threads
look at the whole page
look how many views the tourney threads have
are you stupid?
if people cares about them there would be more than 0 post bro
if your talking about the combined views then your still wrong because they was at them views the other day.
the only reason your threads have tons of views is because you're steady clucking on them
NOW FUCK OFF
the 50+ people that are lurking are looking at the pics linked in the tourney
sone of them aren't even on the site they're just looking st the pics
that counts as traffic
those lurkers that don't post help the site a ton and generate income
before the tourney started there was an average of 3 people in here at any given time
don't talk shit about things you know nothing about
why would you post in them unless you really wanted to say something. It's a poll. It doesn't require a short answer to vote.
But yeah views matter, Jeff wants views.
he only wants views if there clicking on that banner at the top
and i only click on my threads when i post in them, so nasty your threads views is you clicking on them a bunch a times to see the old broads...
why would i click on the threads over and over when i can go to the source where i got the pics from?
i view the threads twice.... once when i make it and once when i close it.... sometimes a third to when zbg replies
now for the love of christ
no, he wants views.
gut said "no"
Separate names with a comma.